About Luis Chanaga
Luis Chanaga is a business development professional and executive who holds years of experience helping organizations reach operational success. Mr. Chanaga received his bachelor’s in accounting and business administration from Southern Adventist University and his MBA in business from Webster University. In the time since, Luis Chanaga has served in a variety of capacities within healthcare administration as an Executive Director, administrator, Vice President, COO, and President.
Mr. Chanaga is recognized within his industry for his firm dedication to helping his businesses streamline processes to the betterment of team members and patient bases. A proponent of comprehensive leadership, Luis Chanaga speaks to the importance of helping professionals of all levels of experience build toward their career goals and bring innovation and advancement to the healthcare field.
Colleagues of Luis Chanaga note that he is a professional who holds extensive knowledge in the healthcare space and its various processes. Those who have worked with Mr. Chanaga uphold that he is an individual who leads by example and does everything possible to facilitate supportive, collaborative environments for his teams. Above all else, Luis is recognized as a healthcare administrator profoundly interested in elevating the way healing is provided and giving his workforce the tools to do so through leadership that prioritizes personal and professional development.
Luis Chanaga on 8 of the Most Common Leadership Styles
Democratic Leadership
Democratic leadership is a leadership style that prioritizes gaining employees’ input prior to making decisions. Dialogue that encourages participation among the group is a defining point of this style. Clear benefits of democratic leadership is that it gives all team members a voice and can boost engagement, team morale, retention, and collaboration in pursuit of goals. Drawbacks, however, are that democratic styles can prolong the decision-making process, can unintentionally foster debate, and can be costly should a leader commit to testing each idea.
Autocratic Leadership
Autocratic leadership serves as a counterpoint to democratic styles and uses a “my way or the highway” approach. Autocratic leaders do not consider the opinions of their team in the decision-making process, instead expecting others to adhere to the decisions made by leadership. A benefit of autocratic leadership is that decisions can be made much faster if the leader is truly the most knowledgeable or experienced member of the team. However, employees can easily feel demotivated and disengaged, resulting in higher turnover and a team environment that isn’t as collaborative or effective as it could be.
Transformational Leadership
Transformational leadership mainly focuses on transforming the business through inspiring members of the workforce to innovate. A hallmark of transformational leadership is looking to streamline processes and make improvements that empower teams to get things done more effectively. Transformational leadership, for this reason, often involves giving employees the freedom to be more autonomous and work towards advancement on their own terms. Naturally, a pro of this style is that it establishes strong trust among teams and can get the ball moving towards transformation towards a shared goal. A con is that transformational leadership can cause discord if the tried and true methods that are being changed are highly valued across teams.
Transactional Leadership
Transactional leaders incentivize effective performance while penalizing or disciplining poor performance. This style can be extremely effective in establishing roles and responsibilities for teams and can keep those who need incentives or boosts to perform more effectively. A weakness of this approach is that it can inspire bare minim work due to employees already knowing the value of their efforts beforehand.
Bureaucratic Leadership
Bureaucratic leadership involves a clear chain of command and tends to be more by the book in its approach. Bureaucratic leaderships styles place the needs of the company above all else and keep strict roles in place for team members to follow. This style can provide much needed stability, especially in settings that have very small room for error. Employees can also very easily identify their roles and responsibilities due to the roadmaps already being provided by leadership. A drawback of bureaucratic leadership is that possibilities for innovation can be left on the table and inflexibility can mean low retention for the most creative or innovative employees.
Laissez-faire Leadership
Laissez-faire, meaning “let them do”, leadership is an unobtrusive style that allows decision making authority to be placed in the hands of team members. Leaders that utilize this style avoid micro management and use a more hands-off approach, providing only the necessary tools and resources to get the job done. Laissez-faire leadership can inspire high levels of trust and independence in creative, self-motivated teams. A caveat, however, is that chaos can arise quite quickly if the team is not well organized or lack the insight to be fully self-directed in pursuit of organizational goals.
Servant Leadership
Servant leadership involves a leader who focuses their energy into developing and elevating teams as their primary means to spur success. Servant leaders serve first and lead second and place the needs of their employees above their own and prioritize listening, empathy, healing, awareness, fostering growth, etc. more than more traditional leadership styles. A benefit of this style is that it can develop nurturing, supportive, and effective teams by showing how committed leadership is to helping others, but the style can lead to undermining of authority if teams do not fully respect or understand the approach.
Coaching Leadership
Coaching leadership works to develop team members by identifying and nurturing their individual strengths and weaknesses. By guiding employees and empowering them to work in terms of their strengths and mitigating the impact of their weaknesses, leaders who use this style can bring teams together and help them collaborate more efficiently as well. Coaching leadership style is powerful because it does not shy away from what makes us individuals and can lead to more specific feedback that guides others toward success. Coaching style can be harder to implement on larger teams and can have unintended consequences on employees who are more resistant to feedback, however.
Interested in More from Luis Chanaga?
Luis Chanaga recognizes that, today, there are many professionals who would like to learn more about key concepts that can build fruitful career paths such as leadership, professional development, etc. With this in mind, posts that draw from Mr. Chanaga’s insights hope to help readers learn more about how to seize opportunities and make more informed decisions regarding their futures.
Readers can expect that future content based on Luis Chanaga’s insights will include:
Leadership: As a professional who has years of experience in healthcare and business development leadership, Mr. Chanaga knows that there are a lot of moving parts when it comes to successfully leading teams and organizations to success. Through content that explores a collection of topics linked to leadership and leadership development, posts on this site aim to help readers build essential leadership skills, make a commitment to their teams, and bring innovation and advancement to their respective fields.
Perseverance: Regardless of your career path, putting your best foot forward each day requires a great deal of perseverance as you rise to challenges and work towards goals. Perseverance and motivation content inspired by Luis Chanaga’s experience will provide readers with crucial insights that empower them to get the most out of each experience and find their own reasons for reaching for the stars in their career.
Focus: Gaining essential skills and remaining motivated has little value if you are unable to retain focus and keep your eyes on the prize in pursuit of your personal goals. In fact, Mr. Chanaga argues that focus is often what separates good professionals from those who are truly pushing the boundaries of their work. To this point, expect that future content that explores focus in its many forms will provide a framework for professionals looking for assistance in identifying their goals and creating pathways to reach them.
Professional Development: A primary goal of this site is to show readers what is possible in their careers if they make a commitment to professional development early on. Seizing additional learning opportunities, certifications, joining professional boards, taking a proactive approach to leadership, all play a role in growing skills that will remain valuable throughout your career development. If you are in search of comprehensive, high-level professional development content that explores the field from different angles and perspectives, look no further than this site.
Want to learn more about professional development, leadership, and more from the insights of an experienced administrator and business development professional such as Luis Chanaga? Feel free to tune in for more information.